3.8 Proceedings Paper

Optimization of Stimulus Color for SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces in Mixed Reality

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8222-4_16

关键词

Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP); Mixed reality (MR); Color contrast ratio (CCR); Cross-correlation task-related component analysis (xTRCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a 10-command SSVEP-BCI system in mixed reality using Hololens2 and investigated the impact of two stimulus colors (white and red) on four monochrome backgrounds (green, blue, white, and black). The results showed that both stimulus and background colors significantly affected BCI performance, and color contrast ratio was an important criterion for optimization.
Visual Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) often use LCDs or LEDs to present flickering stimuli, which limits its application scenarios. Mixed reality head-mounted displays (MRHMDs) have the potential of improving the practical applications for BCIs. However, it's unclear whether the visual stimulus color designed for traditional BCIs still works in mixed reality. Therefore, this study developed a 10-command SSVEP-BCI system in mixed reality using Hololens2, and explored the system's performance with two stimulus colors (white and red) against four monochrome backgrounds (green, blue, white, and black). Eight subjects participated in the experiment. Cross-correlation task-related component analysis (xTRCA) was used to recognize the target command. Results showed that both stimulus and background colors affect BCI performance. Specifically, the white stimulus color significantly outperformed the red one on the blue and black backgrounds, while the red stimulus outperformed thewhite one on the green and white backgrounds. The color contrast ratio (CCR) between the background and stimulus colors correlated positively with SSVEP recognition accuracy. In mixed reality, SSVEP-based BCIs must optimize visual stimulus color, and the CCR is an important criterion for optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据