相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。The Quick and the Careless: The Construct Validity of Page Time as a Measure of Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Nathan A. Bowling et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2023)
A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data
Esther Ulitzsch et al.
PSYCHOMETRIKA (2022)
Detecting Careless Responding in Survey Data Using Stochastic Gradient Boosting
Ulrich Schroeders et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2022)
Will the Questions Ever End? Person-Level Increases in Careless Responding During Questionnaire Completion
Nathan A. Bowling et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2021)
Insufficient Effort Responding as a Potential Confound between Survey Measures and Objective Tests
Jason L. Huang et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
Methods of Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparisons and Practical Recommendations
Maxwell Hong et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2020)
Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research
Christopher D. Nye et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2020)
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
Philippe Goldammer et al.
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY (2020)
A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data
Victor B. Arias et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2020)
The Effects of Questionnaire Length and Behavioral Consequences on Careless Responding
Anthony M. Gibson et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (2020)
Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure
Chester Chun Seng Kam
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Person-Fit as an Index of Inattentive Responding: A Comparison of Methods Using Polytomous Survey Data
Mark F. Beck et al.
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2019)
The Effects of Inattentive Responding on Construct Validity Evidence When Measuring Social-Emotional Learning Competencies
Jeffrey T. Steedle et al.
EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE (2019)
Indiscriminate Responding Can Increase Effect Sizes for Clinical Phenomena in Nonclinical Populations: A Cautionary Note
Ronald R. Holden et al.
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT (2019)
The Impact of Aberrant Response on Reliability and Validity
Tour Liu et al.
MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES (2019)
Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments
Stefan Schneider et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
The Differential Impacts of Two Forms of Insufficient Effort Responding
Justin A. DeSimone et al.
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE (2018)
Dirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research
Justin A. DeSimone et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples
Dustin Wood et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)
Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences
Philip M. Podsakoff et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data
Paul G. Curran
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality: The Case of Job Satisfaction
Chester Chun Seng Kam et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2015)
DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits as Maladaptive Extreme Variants of the Five-Factor Model: An Item-Response Theory Analysis
Takakuni Suzuki et al.
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY (2015)
Insufficient Effort Responding: Examining an Insidious Confound in Survey Data
Jason Huang et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2015)
Best practice recommendations for data screening
Justin A. Desimone et al.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2015)
Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research
Michael R. Maniaci et al.
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2014)
Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data
Adam W. Meade et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2012)
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Jason L. Huang et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2012)
An Examination of Item Response Theory Item Fit Indices for the Graded Response Model
David M. LaHuis et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2011)
Samples in Applied Psychology: Over a Decade of Research in Review
Winny Shen et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
Assessing Goodness of Fit: Simple Rules of Thumb Simply Do Not Work
Christopher D. Nye et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2011)
Random Responding as a Threat to the Validity of Effect Size Estimates in Correlational Research
Marcus Crede
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2010)
Assessing response styles across modes of data collection
Bert Weijters et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE (2008)
A Monte Carlo examination of the sensitivity of the differential functioning of items and tests framework for tests of measurement invariance with likert data
Adam W. Meade et al.
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2007)
A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures
Scott A. Birkeland et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT (2006)
Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis
Carol M. Woods
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT (2006)
The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures
LR Goldberg et al.
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2006)
Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent, and experimental data sets: An application of mixed-model item response theory
MJ Zickar et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2004)
The production and perception of randomness
RS Nickerson
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2002)