4.8 Article

Bimetallic Rhodium Complexes: Precatalyst Activation-Triggered Bimetallic Enhancement for the Hydrosilylation Transformation

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 1999-2010

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c043881999

关键词

bimetallic catalyst; hydrosilylation; rhodium; bimetallic enhancement; reaction mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate the access to bimetallic catalysts with better performance than their monometallic analogues, rhodium(I) complexes with mono- and bimetallic NHC/phosphine (NHC = N-heterocyclic carbene) ligands were designed, synthesized, and characterized. These complexes were used as catalysts for the intermolecular hydrosilylation of diphenylacetylene. All four catalysts showed significantly higher catalytic rates than the donor ligands. The bimetallic catalyst design resulted in enhanced catalytic activity compared to the monometallic analogue. The degree of bimetallic enhancement was found to be highly dependent on reaction conditions, coligands used, and substrate addition order, as revealed by data and mechanistic studies.
To explore how to access bimetallic catalysts that can outperform their monometallic analogues, a set of mono- and bimetallic NHC/phosphine (NHC =N-heterocyclic carbene)ligated rhodium(I) complexes were designed, synthesized, and characterized. The complexes were used as catalysts for the intermolecular hydrosilylation of diphenylacetylene. All four catalysts displayed significantly faster catalytic rates than the donor ligands. The bimetallic catalyst design led to enhanced catalytic activity over the monometallic analogue. The data revealed that the degree of bimetallic enhancement was highly dependent on the reaction conditions, coligands used, and the substrate addition order. The catalytic trends, in combination with mechanistic studies using individual substrates and density functional theory calculations, exposed that the bimetallic benefits were strongly linked to the catalyst activation procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据