3.8 Article

Cattle Farm Wastewater Treatment by Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland System

期刊

REVISTA VIRTUAL DE QUIMICA
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 728-740

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.21577/1984-6835.20230009

关键词

Tratamento de efluente; wetland; nutrientes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated a vertical flow constructed wetland system for treating cattle farm wastewater. Five treatment systems were constructed in drums, with four filled with vetiver grass and one without plant. Evapotranspiration values for the wetlands ranged from 11.1% to 73.0%, and the surface application rate ranged from 0.07 to 0.13 m3m-2d-1. The samples collected during the study showed high pollutant removal rates, with average removals of 95.3% for COD, 94.2% for P-PO43-, 98.0% for N-NH4+, and 93.1% for N-NO3-.
The present work evaluated a vertical flow constructed wetland (CW) system for the treatment of cattle farm wastewater. Was constructed 5 treatment systems in drums of approximately 50 L, 4 filled with plant (vetiver grass) and one without plant, with the base for the 5 units filled with gravel and sand. In a period of 3 days, samples were collected every 24 h before and after treatment. Values of evapotranspiration obtained for CW's was between 11.1 to 73.0% and the rate of surface application ranging from 0.07 to 0.13 m3m-2d-1. The CW without a plant showed evapotranspiration between 32.7 to 82.3% and with a surface application rate between 0.09 and 0.14 m3m-2d-1. The sand presented a CU of 5.3 with a d10 of 0.265 mm and d60 of 1.088 mm. The gravel presented a uniformity coefficient of 5.3; d10 and d60 of 2.771 and 14.785 mm, respectively. In general, in WC's systems with the presence of vetiver grass, the most expressive results were observed in relation to WC without plant. The samples collected during the study showed high pollutant removal rate, obtaining average removals of 95.3% for COD, 94.2% for P-PO43-, 98.0% for N-NH4+ and 93.1% for N-NO3-.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据