4.1 Article

Chitosan scaffolds with mesoporous hydroxyapatite and mesoporous bioactive glass

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 137-153

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40204-023-00217-x

关键词

Mesoporous hydroxyapatite; Mesoporous bioactive glass; Chitosan; Scaffold; Bone tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone regeneration is focused on developing composite scaffolds made of chitosan and ceramics like mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) and mesoporous hydroxyapatite (MHAp). The morphology and properties of the scaffolds were optimized through lyophilization. The composite scaffolds of chitosan with MBG and MHAp showed the best performance in terms of mechanical properties and cell adhesion and proliferation.
Bone regeneration is one of the most well-known fields in tissue regeneration. The major focus concerns polymeric/ceramic composite scaffolds. In this work, several composite scaffolds based on chitosan (CH), with low and high molecular weights, and different concentrations of ceramics like mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG), mesoporous hydroxyapatite (MHAp) and both MBG and MHAp (MC) were produced by lyophilization. The purpose is to identify the best combination regarding optimal morphology and properties. The tests of the scaffolds present a highly porous structure with interconnected pores. The compression modulus increases with ceramic concentration in the scaffolds. Furthermore, the 75%MBG (835 +/- 160 kPa) and 50%MC (1070 +/- 205 kPa) samples are the ones that mostly enhance increases in mechanical properties. The swelling capacity increases with MBG and MC, respectively, to 700% and 900% and decreases to 400% when MHAp concentration increases. All scaffolds are non-cytotoxic at 12.5 mg/mL. The CHL scaffolds improve cell adhesion and proliferation compared to CHH, and the MC scaffold samples, show better results than those produced with just MBG or MHAp. The composite scaffolds of chitosan with MBG and MHAp, have revealed to be the best combination due to their enhanced performance in bone tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据