4.6 Article

Synthesis of neodymium ferrite incorporated graphitic carbonitride (NdFe2O4@g-C3N4) and its application in the photodegradation of ciprofloxacin and ampicillin in a water system

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 5405-5418

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra08070b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a photocatalyst, NdFe2O4@g-C3N4, by incorporating neodymium ferrite (NdFe2O4) in graphitic carbonitride (g-C3N4), for removing ciprofloxacin (CIP) and ampicillin (AMP) from water systems. The results showed that NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 exhibited higher photodegradation efficiency and better regeneration capacity than NdFe2O4 alone.
Purification of antibiotic-contaminated drinking water sources is faced with limitations. Therefore, this study incorporated neodymium ferrite (NdFe2O4) in graphitic carbonitride (g-C3N4) to form NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 as a photocatalyst for removing ciprofloxacin (CIP) and ampicillin (AMP) from aqueous systems. X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed a crystallite size of 25.15 nm for NdFe2O4 and 28.49 nm for NdFe2O4@g-C3N4. The bandgap is 2.10 and 1.98 eV for NdFe2O4 and NdFe2O4@g-C3N4, respectively. The transmission electron micrograph (TEM) images of NdFe2O4 and NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 gave an average particle size of 14.10 nm and 18.23 nm, respectively. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images showed heterogeneous surfaces with irregular-sized particles suggesting agglomeration at the surfaces. NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 (100.00 +/- 0.00% for CIP and 96.80 +/- 0.80% for AMP) exhibited better photodegradation efficiency towards CIP and AMP than NdFe2O4 (78.45 +/- 0.80% for CIP and 68.25 +/- 0.60% for AMP) in a process described by pseudo-first-order kinetics. NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 showed a stable regeneration capacity towards degradation of CIP and AMP with a capacity that is above 95% even at the 15th cycle of treatment. The use of NdFe2O4@g-C3N4 in this study revealed its potential as a promising photocatalyst for removing CIP and AMP in water systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据