4.7 Article

Palladium- and nickel-catalyzed cascade enantioselective ring-opening/coupling reactions of cyclobutanones

期刊

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 59, 期 23, 页码 3373-3382

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cc00205e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemistry of small ring compounds, specifically cyclobutanones, has been extensively studied due to their high reactivity. While formal cycloaddition reactions of cyclobutanones have been well developed, the alternative reaction paradigm of ring-opening reactions is still underexplored. This feature article summarizes our efforts in developing enantioselective palladium-catalyzed ring-opening/coupling reactions and recently emerging nickel-catalyzed ring-opening/reductive coupling reactions of cyclobutanones. The mechanisms, advantages, limitations, and synthetic applications of each strategy in the synthesis of natural products or bioactive compounds are presented.
The chemistry of small ring compounds is an intriguing subject in organic chemistry. As the smallest stable cyclic aliphatic ketones, cyclobutanones have garnered tremendous attention owing to their intrinsic high reactivity such as transition-metal catalyzed C-C bond cleavage. In this context, transition-metal catalyzed formal cycloaddition of cyclobutanones via a cut and sew strategy has gained marvelous advances. In contrast, an alternative reaction paradigm, i.e., transition-metal catalyzed ring-opening reactions of cyclobutanones, is still underdeveloped. This feature article aims to summarize our efforts in developing enantioselective palladium-catalyzed ring-opening/coupling reactions and recently emerging nickel-catalyzed ring-opening/reductive coupling reactions of cyclobutanones with a tethered aryl halide. The possible mechanisms are briefly showcased and the advantages and limitations of each strategy as well as their synthetic applications in the synthesis of natural products or bioactive compounds are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据