4.2 Review

Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in cavity optomechanics

期刊

FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 75-86

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.09.005

关键词

Cavity optomechanics; Nonequilibrium thermodynamics; Stochastic thermodynamics; Quantum thermodynamics; Entropy production; Fluctuation theorems; Heat transport; Heat engine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical thermodynamics deals with systems in equilibrium or near equilibrium, while nonequilibrium thermodynamics provides a general framework for understanding nonequilibrium processes, especially in small systems that are far-from-equilibrium and dominated by thermal or quantum fluctuations. Cavity optomechanical systems have great potential for studying nonequilibrium thermodynamics due to their high controllability, excellent mechanical performance, and ability to operate in the quantum regime. This article provides an overview of recent advancements in nonequilibrium thermodynamics with cavity optomechanical systems, focusing on experimental results in entropy production assessment, fluctuation theorems, heat transfer, and heat engines.
Classical thermodynamics has been a great achievement in dealing with systems that are in equilibrium or near equilibrium. As an emerging field, nonequilibrium thermodynamics provides a general framework for under-standing the nonequilibrium processes, particularly in small systems that are typically far-from-equilibrium and are dominated by thermal or quantum fluctuations. Cavity optomechanical systems hold great promise among the various experimental platforms for studying nonequilibrium thermodynamics owing to their high controlla-bility, excellent mechanical performance, and ability to operate deep in the quantum regime. Here, we present an overview of the recent advances in nonequilibrium thermodynamics with cavity optomechanical systems. The experimental results in entropy production assessment, fluctuation theorems, heat transfer, and heat engines are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据