4.3 Article

Modern approach to resistant acromegaly

期刊

ENDOCRINE
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 303-307

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03317-7

关键词

Acromegaly; Somatostatin receptor ligands; Pasireotide; Pegvisomant; IGF-I; Growth hormone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A personalized approach to acromegaly treatment, utilizing novel clinical and molecular biomarkers, has shown promising results in predicting responsiveness to second-line medical treatments. Integrating these findings into existing guidelines may significantly improve the management of difficult acromegaly patients.
BackgroundTargets of acromegaly treatment are normalization of biochemical values, removal/reduction/stabilization of the pituitary mass, control of clinical activity and mortality with a multimodal/multidisciplinary approach. Despite significant technological and pharmacological progress, still several patients with acromegaly bear a resistant somatotroph adenoma and active disease may persist for many years with resultant poor clinical outcomes.AimTo review briefly definition and pathophysiology of resistance to acromegaly treatment and the options of medical treatment in this context, exploring the role of novel clinical and molecular biomarkers in the personalization of therapy and proposing updates to the currently available guidelines for the treatment of resistant GH-secreting adenomas.ConclusionsIn the last few years, in parallel with the increased number of medical options available for the therapy of acromegaly, relevant advances occurred in the understanding of the role of novel molecular and clinical biomarkers in predicting the responsiveness to second-line medical treatments, such as Pegvisomant and Pasireotide LAR, and helping clinicians in the personalization of the follow-up and treatment of resistant somatotroph adenomas. The integration of these findings into the existing guidelines may represent a possibly important step forward in the management of difficult acromegaly patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据