4.8 Article

Electromagnetic mill promoted mechanochemical palladium-catalyzed solid state cyanation of aryl bromides using non-toxic K4[Fe(CN)6]

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 2279-2286

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2gc04506k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the development of palladium-catalyzed cyanation in 1973, there has been widespread interest in the transition metal-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides using Pd, Ni, and Cu. However, these reactions require highly polar organic solvents and high temperatures. In this study, we have developed a non-toxic K-4[Fe(CN)(6)]-promoted mechanochemical palladium-catalyzed solid-state cyanation of aryl bromides using an electromagnetic mill (EMM) without additional heating. This strategy offers a broad substrate scope, good functional group tolerance, liquid-assisted grinding, air and moisture insensitivity, no additional heating requirement, and efficient gram-scale synthesis.
Since Takagi et al. first developed palladium-catalyzed cyanation in 1973, transition metal-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides, using Pd, Ni and Cu, has attracted widespread interest. However, the reactions are all dependent on highly polar organic solvents and high temperatures. Herein, we have developed the first electromagnetic mill (EMM) promoted mechanochemical palladium-catalyzed solid state cyanation of aryl bromides using non-toxic K-4[Fe(CN)(6)] without additional heating. This strategy features broad substrate scope, good functional group tolerance, liquid-assisted grinding, air and moisture insensitivity, no additional heating, and efficient gram-scale synthesis. The EMM conditions can improve the efficiency of the reaction by colliding better mixed solid reactants with ferromagnetic rods at high speed. This EMM system not only provides a simple method for the preparation of aromatic nitriles which have a wide industrial application prospect, but also affords a broad space for liquid-assisted grinding solid metal catalytic synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据