4.4 Review

Underlying Features of Prostate Cancer-Statistics, Risk Factors, and Emerging Methods for Its Diagnosis

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 2300-2321

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020178

关键词

prostate cancer; incidence; mortality; risk factors; biomarkers

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer is a highly heterogeneous tumor that can range from indolent to aggressive forms. Overtreatment of patients with prostate cancer can lead to significant burdens, while careful monitoring can help avoid these problems. Early detection and knowledge of modifiable risk factors are important for reducing cancer risk. Innovations in prostate cancer diagnostics and therapy are needed to overcome current limitations.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently occurring type of malignant tumor and a leading cause of oncological death in men. PCa is very heterogeneous in terms of grade, phenotypes, and genetics, displaying complex features. This tumor often has indolent growth, not compromising the patient's quality of life, while its more aggressive forms can manifest rapid growth with progression to adjacent organs and spread to lymph nodes and bones. Nevertheless, the overtreatment of PCa patients leads to important physical, mental, and economic burdens, which can be avoided with careful monitoring. Early detection, even in the cases of locally advanced and metastatic tumors, provides a higher chance of cure, and patients can thus go through less aggressive treatments with fewer side effects. Furthermore, it is important to offer knowledge about how modifiable risk factors can be an effective method for reducing cancer risk. Innovations in PCa diagnostics and therapy are still required to overcome some of the limitations of the current screening techniques, in terms of specificity and sensitivity. In this context, this review provides a brief overview of PCa statistics, reporting its incidence and mortality rates worldwide, risk factors, and emerging screening strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据