4.4 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of New Indeno[1,2-b]fluorene6,12-dione Derivatives

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 223-228

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.6023/cjoc202206038

关键词

indeno[1,2-b]fluorene; organic semiconductor; Suzuki coupling reaction; crystal structure; rigid framework

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indeno fluorene-6,12-dione derivatives 5 were synthesized by modifying 2,5-dibromo-p-xylene and phenylboronic acid derivatives. The introduction of alkyl chains improved the solubility of the compounds and the effects of systematic substitution variation on their properties were investigated. The new compounds showed better solubility, thermal and optical stability than pentacene. The molecular packing of 2,8Diisopropylindeno[1,2-b]fluorene-6,12-dione (5b) and 2,8-dibutylindeno[1,2-b]fluorene-6,12-dione (5c) facilitated carrier transport.
Indeno fluorene-6,12-dione derivatives 5 modified by different alkyl substitutions were designed and synthesized from 2,5-dibromo-p-xylene and phenylboronic acid derivatives through oxidation, esterification, Suzuki coupling, saponi-fication and cyclization reactions. Alkyl chains of different lengths were introduced into molecules to improve the solubility of the compounds and investigate the effects of systematic substitution variation on their properties. It was found that the solubility, thermal and optical stability of the new compounds were better than those of pentacene. Compounds 5 have increased electronegativities because of the low lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies (=-3.4 eV). 2,8Diisopropylindeno[1,2-b]fluorene-6,12-dione (5b) and 2,8-dibutylindeno[1,2-b]fluorene-6,12-dione (5c) have rigid molecular frameworks and pack into slipped face-to-face p-stacks, the layer spacings are 0.3457 and 0.3423 nm, respectively. The molecular packing could facilitate carrier transport. The properties of these new materials indicate that they are good candidates for applications in organic optoelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据