4.7 Article

Natural wetlands efficiency assessment in removing sugarcane fields' drainage contaminants: a case study in Khuzestan, Southwest Province of Iran

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 17, 页码 51003-51017

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-25858-0

关键词

Heavy metals; Wetland; Nutrients; Retention time; Naseri Wetland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of the Naseri Wetland in the qualitative treatment of agricultural drainage from Khuzestan sugarcane was investigated. The wetland showed the highest removal efficiency for heavy metals and nutrients at the farthest station, W3.
The present study investigated the efficiency of a real-scale natural wetland (Naseri Wetland) in the qualitative treatment of agricultural drainage of Khuzestan sugarcane for 1 year (2019-2020). This study divides the wetland length into three equal parts in W1, W2, and W3 stations. The efficiency of the wetland in removing contaminants such as Cr, Cd, BOD5, TDS, TN, and TP is evaluated by field sampling, laboratory analysis, and t-test. Results indicate that the highest mean difference in Cr, Cd, BOD, TDS, TN, and TP are observed between W0 and W3. At W3, the farthest station from the entry point, the highest removal efficiency is obtained for each factor. Removal percentage of Cd, Cr, and TP in all seasons is equal to 100% up to station 3 (W3), and BOD5 and TN are 75% and 65%, respectively. Also, the results show a gradual rise in TDS along the wetland's length due to high evaporation and transpiration in the area. Naseri Wetland reduces the Cr, Cd, BOD, TN, and TP compared to the initial level. This decrease is more significant at W2 and W3, and it is worth mentioning that W3 has the most considerable reduction. With increasing distance from the entry point, the effect of timing of 1.10, 1.26, 1.30, and 1.60 on removing heavy metals and nutrients is high. The highest efficiency is observed for each retention time at W3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据