4.5 Article

Relationship between the sub-micron fraction (SMF) and fine-mode fraction (FMF) in the context of AERONET retrievals

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 1103-1120

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-1103-2023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares the sub-micron aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from AERONET inversion and spectral deconvolution algorithm, and proposes a linear equation to explain the relationship between sub-micron AOD and fine-mode AOD. The results reveal that the behavior of sub-micron fraction versus fine-mode fraction depends on the truncation of coarse-mode AOD and fine-mode AOD. The study confirms that the impact of truncating modal features can be detected through the analysis of sub-micron fraction versus fine-mode fraction.
The sub-micron (SM) aerosol optical depth (AOD) is an optical separation based on the fraction of particles below a specified cutoff radius of the particle size distribution (PSD) at a given particle radius. It is fundamentally different from spectrally separated FM (fine-mode) AOD. We present a simple (AOD-normalized) SM fraction versus FM fraction (SMF vs. FMF) linear equation that explains the well-recognized empirical result of SMF generally being greater than the FMF. The AERONET inversion (AERinv) products (combined inputs of spectral AOD and sky radiance) and the spectral deconvolution algorithm (SDA) products (input of AOD spectra) enable, respectively, an empirical SMF vs. FMF comparison at similar (columnar) remote sensing scales across a variety of aerosol types.SMF (AERinv-derived) vs. FMF (SDA-derived) behavior is primarily dependent on the relative truncated portion (epsilon(c)) of the coarse-mode (CM) AOD associated with the cutoff portion of the CM PSD and, to a second order, the cutoff FM PSD and FM AOD (epsilon(f)). The SMF vs. FMF equation largely explains the SMF vs. FMF behavior of the AERinv vs. SDA products as a function of PSD cutoff radius ( inflection point ) across an ensemble of AERONET sites and aerosol types (urban-industrial, biomass burning, dust, maritime and a mixed class of Arctic aerosols). The overarching dynamic was that the linear SMF vs. FMF relation pivots clockwise about the approximate (SMF, FMF) singularity of (1, 1) in a linearly inverse fashion (slope and intercept of approximately 1-epsilon(c) and epsilon(c)) with increasing cutoff radius. SMF vs. FMF slopes and intercepts derived from AERinv and SDA retrievals confirmed the general domination of epsilon(c) over epsilon f in controlling that dynamic. A more general conclusion is the apparent confirmation that the optical impact of truncating modal (whole) PSD features can be detected by an SMF vs. FMF analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据