4.7 Article

China's energy policy and sustainable energy transition for sustainable development: green investment in renewable technological paradigm

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 18, 页码 51491-51503

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-25734-x

关键词

Fossil-based energy; Greenhouse gases (GHGs); Chinese policy; Renewable energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the interactions among energy policy, technological innovation, economic development, trade openness, and sustainable development in China from 1990 to 2020. The findings show that renewable energy policy and technology innovation are negatively associated with sustainable development. However, it is also found that energy use significantly increases both short-term and long-term environmental damage. The study recommends that politicians and government officials focus on developing the proper energy policy mix, urban planning, and pollution prevention without compromising economic growth.
It is generally accepted that China is a significant cause of global warming and other climate change consequences. This paper applies panel cointegration tests and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) techniques to investigate the interactions among energy policy, technological innovation, economic development, trade openness, and sustainable development using panel data from China from 1990 to 2020. Results explain that renewable energy policy and technology innovation are negatively associated with sustainable development. However, research shows that energy use significantly increases both short-term and long-term environmental damage. The findings show that economic growth has a lasting impact on the environment by distorting it. The findings recommend that politicians and government officials hold the key to attaining a green and clean environment by focusing on developing the proper energy policy mix, urban planning, and pollution prevention without compromising economic growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据