4.6 Review

Understanding CNS Effects of Antimicrobial Drugs Using Zebrafish Models

期刊

VETERINARY SCIENCES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10020096

关键词

antimicrobial drugs; microbiota; antibiotic; zebrafish; brain; behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial drugs can influence the central nervous system and gut microbiota, leading to changes in brain and behavior. Zebrafish models are useful for studying the effects of these drugs on the central nervous system. Recent research has revealed the impacts of a wide range of antimicrobial drugs on brain and behavior in zebrafish.
Simple Summary Antimicrobial drugs, in addition to exerting antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic, or antiviral effects, may also affect the central nervous system and gut microbiota, thereby modulating brain and behavior. Zebrafish models can be used for studying the effects of antimicrobial drugs on the central nervous system. Here, we discuss recent findings on using zebrafish for assessing the effects of a wide range of antimicrobial drugs on brain and behavior in vivo. Antimicrobial drugs represent a diverse group of widely utilized antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic and antiviral agents. Their growing use and clinical importance necessitate our improved understanding of physiological effects of antimicrobial drugs, including their potential effects on the central nervous system (CNS), at molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels. In addition, antimicrobial drugs can alter the composition of gut microbiota, and hence affect the gut-microbiota-brain axis, further modulating brain and behavioral processes. Complementing rodent studies, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) emerges as a powerful model system for screening various antimicrobial drugs, including probing their putative CNS effects. Here, we critically discuss recent evidence on the effects of antimicrobial drugs on brain and behavior in zebrafish, and outline future related lines of research using this aquatic model organism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据