3.9 Review

APE2: catalytic function and synthetic lethality draw attention as a cancer therapy target

期刊

NAR CANCER
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AP endonuclease 2 (APE2) is a critical protein involved in genome and epigenome integrity. It has a catalytic function in DNA repair, and recent studies have also shown its involvement in the immune response and DNA damage response. APE2 has been identified as a synthetic lethal target in cancer cells, and its overexpression in certain cancer types suggests its potential as an oncogene and prognostic marker. The modulation and manipulation of APE2's catalytic function and synthetic lethality as a target for cancer therapy needs further exploration.
AP endonuclease 2 (APE2, APEX2 or APN2) is an emerging critical protein involved in genome and epigenome integrity. Whereas its catalytic function as a nuclease in DNA repair is widely accepted, recent studies have elucidated the function and mechanism of APE2 in the immune response and DNA damage response. Several genome-wide screens have identified APE2 as a synthetic lethal target for deficiencies of BRCA1, BRCA2 or TDP1 in cancer cells. Due to its overexpression in several cancer types, APE2 is proposed as an oncogene and could serve as prognostic marker of overall survival of cancer treatment. However, it remains to be discovered whether and how APE2 catalytic function and synthetic lethality can be modulated and manipulated as a cancer therapy target. In this review, we provide a current understanding of alterations and expression of APE2 in cancer, the function of APE2 in the immune response, and mechanisms of APE2 in ATR/Chk1 DNA damage response. We also summarize the role of APE2 in DNA repair pathways in the removal of heterogenous and complexed 3'-termini and MMEJ. Finally, we provide an updated perspective on how APE2 may be targeted for cancer therapy and future directions of APE2 studies in cancer biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据