4.0 Article

An Occupation-Based Healthy Nutrition and Wellness Program for Individuals With Schizophrenia

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15394492231153113

关键词

occupation-based program; schizophrenia; healthy nutrition; dietary habits; well-being

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effectiveness of an occupation-based Healthy Nutrition and Wellness Program (HNWP) on dietary knowledge, habits, metabolic values, and well-being of people with schizophrenia was investigated in this study. Findings showed that HNWP increased the healthy nutrition knowledge, improved some dietary habits, increased HDL cholesterol, and promoted general well-being of individuals with schizophrenia. Inclusion of occupation-based HNWPs into treatment of individuals with schizophrenia can increase awareness about healthy life and improve their dietary habits and well-being.
This study investigated the effectiveness of an occupation-based Healthy Nutrition and Wellness Program (HNWP) on dietary knowledge, dietary habits, metabolic values, and well-being of people with schizophrenia. Forty clients attended the HNWP once a week for 12 weeks in addition to routine treatment. Metabolic values, biochemical values, dietary habits, Healthy Nutrition Knowledge Form, and Well-being Questionnaire were measured before the HNWP, after the HNWP, and at 6-month follow-up. Repeated measures factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare each continuous variable and Cochran's Q test was used to compare categorical variables before HNWP, after HNWP, and at follow-up. Findings showed that HNWP increased the healthy nutrition knowledge, improved some dietary habits, increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and promoted general well-being of the individuals with schizophrenia. There was no gender difference in all variables. Inclusion of occupation-based HNWPs into treatment of individuals with schizophrenia can increase awareness about healthy life and improve their dietary habits and well-being.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据