4.6 Article

Electrical and mechanical stability of flexible, organic electrolyte-gated transistors based on iongel and hydrogels

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 4623-4633

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3tc00410d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of iongel and hydrogel as gating media for EGTs with the organic semiconductor DPP-DTT as the channel material. It is found that iongel-gated transistors show better electrical stability compared to hydrogel-gated transistors due to the dehydration of hydrogels over time. By adding glycerol as an anti-dehydrating agent, the operational stability of the devices is improved. Flexible EGTs on PET are also fabricated and can operate under different bending radii.
Electrolyte-gated transistors (EGTs) have been widely investigated for applications in bioelectronics owing to their low operating voltage and mixed ionic-electronic conduction. The ion-gating media play a primary role in determining the operating voltage and electrical stability of these devices. In this study, we employed an iongel based on an ionic liquid and hydrogels based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as the gating media for EGTs using the organic semiconductor poly(N-alkyldiketopyrrolo-pyrrole-dithienylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene) (DPP-DTT) as the channel material. The device characteristics revealed that iongel-gated transistors showed superior electrical stability over hydrogel-gated transistors, because hydrogels undergo dehydration over time. After 65 cycles of pulse measurements, the drain current of the iongel-gated devices did not show any significant change, whereas it decreased to similar to 50% of the initial value for the hydrogel-gated devices. By adding glycerol as an anti-dehydrating agent, the current decreased by only similar to 10% under the same conditions, demonstrating improved operational stability. Finally, we fabricated flexible EGTs on polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which can be operated under different bending radii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据