3.8 Review

Investigating different typologies for the synthesis of evidence: a scoping review protocol

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching

Neal R. Haddaway et al.

Summary: Systematic searching aims to find all relevant research, and citation chasing is a supplementary method to identify studies that may not be retrieved by other search methods. We have developed a free tool for rapid forward and backward citation chasing.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2022)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

The web-based Right Reviewtool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 knowledge synthesis methods

Krystle Amog et al.

Summary: This study aims to develop a web-based decision support tool that recommends knowledge synthesis methods suitable for users' research question through a series of simple questions. The tool was developed through four steps: designing, testing, disseminating, and evaluating. Evaluation results showed that the tool was fit-for-purpose and easy to use.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial

Justin Michael Clark et al.

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2020)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

Micah D. J. Peters et al.

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Zoe Jordan et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE (2019)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems

David Gough et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches

Andrew Booth et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2018)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

Zachary Munn et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)

Review Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Conceptual and practical classification of research reviews and other evidence synthesis products

Julia H. Littell

CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Jessie McGowan et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Nursing

The Systematic Review

Edoardo Aromataris et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (2014)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach

Zachary Munn et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting

Heather L. Colquhoun et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The art and science of knowledge synthesis

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)

Review Information Science & Library Science

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

Maria J. Grant et al.

HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL (2009)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda

S Thorne et al.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2004)