4.7 Article

Evaporation of a Kerr-black-bounce by emission of scalar particles

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 107, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044067

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the evaporation of a regular rotating black hole under the Hawking emission of a single scalar field. The black hole is described by the Kerr-black-bounce metric with a nearly extremal regularizing parameter l = 0.99r+. We compare the results with a Kerr black hole evaporating under the same conditions. Our findings show that the regular black hole evolves to a non-Schwarzschild-like state with a slightly different asymptotic spin compared to a Kerr black hole. We also discuss how the surface gravity affects the temperature and primary emissivity, resulting in a longer lifetime for the regular black hole. Finally, we briefly comment on the possibility of investigating the beyond-the-horizon structure of a black hole through its Hawking emission.
We study a regular rotating black hole evaporating under the Hawking emission of a single scalar field. The black hole is described by the Kerr-black-bounce metric with a nearly extremal regularizing parameter l = 0.99r+. We compare the results with a Kerr black hole evaporating under the same conditions. First, we compute the graybody factors and show that the Kerr-black-bounce evolves toward a non-Schwarzschild-like asymptotic state with a* -0.47, differently from a Kerr black hole whose asymptotic spin would be a* -0.555. We show that this result depends on the combined contributions of the changes in the graybody factors and in the surface gravity introduced by the regularizing parameter. We also discuss how the surface gravity affects the temperature and the primary emissivity and decreases those quantities with respect to the Kerr black hole. Consequently, the regular black hole has a longer lifetime. Finally, we briefly comment on the possibility of investigating the beyond-the-horizon structure of a black hole by exploiting its Hawking emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据