4.6 Review

Research Progress on the Solder Joint Reliability of Electronics Using in Deep Space Exploration

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-023-00834-4

关键词

Deep space exploration; Extreme environments; Solder joints; Microstructure; Electronics; Reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spacecraft for deep space exploration missions will encounter extreme environments, including cryogenic temperature, intense radiation, wide-range temperature variations, and even a combination of these conditions. The degradation or failure of solder joints in harsh environments can result in damage to onboard electronics. The research on high reliability solder joints in extreme environments can reduce the need for onboard protection devices and improve the overall reliability of spacecraft, which is of great significance to the aviation industry. This paper reviews the reliability research on SnPb solder alloys, Sn-based lead-free solder alloys, and In-based solder alloys in extreme environments, and provides suggestions for future studies focusing on solder joint reliability under extreme environments.
The spacecraft for deep space exploration missions will face extreme environments, including cryogenic temperature, intense radiation, wide-range temperature variations and even the combination of conditions mentioned above. Harsh environments will lead to solder joints degradation or even failure, resulting in damage to onboard electronics. The research activities on high reliability solder joints using in extreme environments can not only reduce the use of onboard protection devices, but effectively improve the overall reliability of spacecraft, which is of great significance to the aviation industry. In this paper, we review the reliability research on SnPb solder alloys, Sn-based lead-free solder alloys and In-based solder alloys in extreme environments, and try to provide some suggestions for the follow-up studies, which focus on solder joint reliability under extreme environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据