4.5 Article

An edge intelligence-enhanced quantitative assessment model for implicit working gain under mobile internet of things

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 7548-7564

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023326

关键词

edge intelligence; mobile IoT; quantitative assessment model; mobile computing; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edge intelligence refers to the implementation of intelligent algorithms in edge devices to overcome computing power limitations. By utilizing data integration capabilities of IoT, intelligent algorithms can be employed in terminals for intelligent data analysis. This study utilizes fundamental data acquisition from a mobile IoT environment and employs distributed edge terminals to implement machine learning algorithms to create a quantitative assessment model for implicit working gain.
Edge intelligence refers to a novel operation mode in which intelligent algorithms are implemented in edge devices to break the limitation of computing power. In the context of big data, mobile computing has been an effective assistive tool in many cross-field areas, in which quantitative assessment of implicit working gain is typical. Relying on the strong ability of data integration provided by the Internet of Things (IoT), intelligent algorithms can be equipped into terminals to realize intelligent data analysis. This work takes the assessment of working gain in universities as the main problem scenario, an edge intelligence-enhanced quantitative assessment model for implicit working gain under mobile IoT. Based on fundamental data acquisition from deployed mobile IoT environment, all the distributed edge terminals are employed to implement machine learning algorithms to formulate a quantitative assessment model. The dataset collected from a real-world application is utilized to evaluate the performance of the proposed mobile edge computing framework, and proper performance can be obtained and observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据