4.7 Review

A comprehensive review on quinolone contamination in environments: current research progress

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 17, 页码 48778-48792

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26263-3

关键词

Quinolone; Antibiotics; Pollution; Toxicity; Removal method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quinolone antibiotics are widely used in the treatment of human and animal diseases due to their strong antibacterial activity, stable metabolism, and low cost. However, they often cause environmental pollution as they cannot be completely digested and are excreted in urine and feces. The pollution status, biological toxicity, and removal methods of these antibiotics were reviewed, revealing their ecotoxicity and potential for inducing drug resistance.
Quinolone (QN) antibiotics are a kind of broad-spectrum antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of human and animal diseases. They have the characteristics of strong antibacterial activity, stable metabolism, low production cost, and no cross-resistance with other antibacterial drugs. They are widely used in the world. QN antibiotics cannot be completely digested and absorbed in organisms and are often excreted in urine and feces in the form of original drugs or metabolites, which are widely occurring in surface water, groundwater, aquaculture wastewater, sewage treatment plants, sediments, and soil environment, thus causing environmental pollution. In this paper, the pollution status, biological toxicity, and removal methods of QN antibiotics at home and abroad were reviewed. Literature data showed that QNs and its metabolites had serious ecotoxicity. Meanwhile, the spread of drug resistance induced by continuous emission of QNs should not be ignored. In addition, adsorption, chemical oxidation, photocatalysis, and microbial removal of QNs are often affected by a variety of experimental conditions, and the removal is not complete, so it is necessary to combine a variety of processes to efficiently remove QNs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据