4.7 Article

Spatial Data Quality in the Internet of Things: Management, Exploitation, and Prospects

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3498338

关键词

Internet of Things; geo-sensory data; quality management; location refinement; spatiotemporal data cleaning; spatial queries; spatial computing; spatiotemporal dependencies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This survey focuses on the data quality issues in the Internet of Things (IoT), providing insights and analysis on major dimensions, technologies, trends, and open issues related to spatially referenced IoT data. It aims to offer valuable references for practitioners developing IoT-enabled applications and researchers conducting IoT data quality research.
With the continued deployment of the Internet of Things (IoT), increasing volumes of devices are being deployed that emit massive spatially referenced data. Due in part to the dynamic, decentralized, and heterogeneous architecture of the IoT, the varying and often low quality of spatial IoT data (SID) presents challenges to applications built on top of this data. This survey aims to provide unique insight to practitioners who intend to develop IoT-enabled applications and to researchers who wish to conduct research that relates to data quality in the IoT setting. The survey offers an inventory analysis of major data quality dimensions in SID and covers significant data characteristics and associated quality considerations. The survey summarizes data quality related technologies from both task and technique perspectives. Organizing the technologies from the task perspective, it covers recent progress in SID quality management, encompassing location refinement, uncertainty elimination, outlier removal, fault correction, data integration, and data reduction; and it covers low-quality SID exploitation, encompassing querying, analysis, and decision-making techniques. Finally, the survey covers emerging trends and open issues concerning the quality of SID.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据