4.5 Article

Logistic models to minimize the material handling cost within a cross-dock

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 3099-3119

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023146

关键词

cross -docking; scheduling; advanced logistics; material handling; storage space allocation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a linear programming model based on door-to-storage assignment to optimize the material handling cost within a cross-dock. The result shows that the cost can be minimized or savings can be intensified based on the feasibility of the research problem.
Retail supply chains are intended to empower effectiveness, speed, and cost-savings, guaranteeing that items get to the end client brilliantly, giving rise to the new logistic strategy of cross -docking. Cross-docking popularity depends heavily on properly executing operational-level policies like assigning doors to trucks or handling resources to doors. This paper proposes a linear programming model based on door-to-storage assignment. The model aims to optimize the material handling cost within a cross-dock when goods are unloaded and transferred from the dock area to the storage area. A fraction of the products unloaded at the incoming gates is assigned to different storage zones depending on their demand frequency and the loading sequence. Numerical example considering a varying number of inbound cars, doors, products, and storage areas is analyzed, and the result proves that the cost can be minimized or savings can be intensified based on the feasibility of the research problem. The result explains that a variation in the number of inbound trucks, product quantity, and per-pallet handling prices influences the net material handling cost. However, it remains unaffected by the alteration in the number of material handling resources. The result also verifies that applying direct transfer of product through cross-docking is economical as fewer products in storage reduce the handling cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据