4.4 Review

IgG4-related disease with kidney and lymph nodes involvement: a case-based review

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 1183-1193

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05295-5

关键词

IgG4-related disease; IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis; IgG4-related lymphadenopathy; Kidney; Lymph nodes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is a case report of a 35-year-old man with IgG4-related disease, presenting with initial symptoms of facial edema and recent onset of proteinuria. It took over a year from symptom onset to diagnosis. Treatment with glucocorticoids led to a good prognosis without recurrence.
IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), a rare immune-mediated chronic fibro-inflammatory condition, has various initial symptoms, thus posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Here, we report a case of IgG4-RD in a 35-year-old man with initial clinical symptoms of facial edema and recent onset of proteinuria. It took more than 1 year from the onset of clinical symptoms to diagnosis. Pathological examination of renal biopsy revealed significant renal interstitial lymphoid tissue hyperplasia simulating growth pattern of lymphoma. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results showed that CD4 + T lymphocyte hyperplasia was dominant. There was no significant deletion of CD2/CD3/CD5/CD7. No monoclone was detected in TCR gene rearrangement. IHC staining showed that the number of IgG4-positive cells was greater than 100/HPF. The ratio of IgG4/IgG was greater than 40%. Combined with clinically examinations, IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis was considered. Further cervical lymph node biopsy results suggested IgG4-related lymphadenopathy. He received methylprednisolone 40 mg/day intravenously for 10 days, leading to normal results of laboratory tests and clinical manifestations. The patient had a good prognosis without recurrence during 14 months of follow-up. This case report can be used as a reference for early diagnosis and treatment of such patients in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据