4.5 Review

Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 1565-1603

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2se01517j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low temperature water electrolysers are sensitive to water quality and common impurities can affect the device performance and lifetime. Purifying the feed water adds cost and complexity, and failure of purification equipment can cause degradation of the electrolysers. This review provides a comprehensive overview of impurities in operating electrolysers, including their sources, degradation mechanisms, characterization techniques, water purification technologies, and mitigation strategies. It generalizes existing mechanisms, proposes new ones, and offers a framework for considering operational implications.
Low temperature water electrolysers such as Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysers (PEMWEs), Alkaline Water Electrolysers (AWEs), and Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysers (AEMWEs) are known to be sensitive to water quality, with a range of common impurities impacting performance, hydrogen quality and device lifetime. Purification of feed water adds to cost, operational complexity, and design limitations, while failure of purification equipment can lead to degradation of electrolyser materials and components. Increased robustness to impurities will offer a route to longer device lifetimes and reduced operating costs but understanding of the impact of impurities and associated degradation mechanisms is currently limited. This critical review offers, for the first time, a comprehensive overview of relevant impurities in operating electrolysers and their impact. Impurity sources, degradation mechanisms, characterisation techniques, water purification technologies and mitigation strategies are identified and discussed. The review generalises already reported mechanisms, proposes new mechanisms, and provides a framework for consideration of operational implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据