4.5 Article

A Spacecraft Equipment Layout Optimization Method for Diverse and Competitive Design

期刊

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2023.025143

关键词

Layout optimization; non-overlap; similarity measures; sampling methods; physical performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the spacecraft equipment layout optimization design problems with complicated performance constraints and diversity. By introducing similarity measures and optimization algorithms, the geometric diversity of layout schemes is considered to generate diversified layout schemes. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology are demonstrated by two practical applications.
The spacecraft equipment layout optimization design (SELOD) problems with complicated performance con-straints and diversity are studied in this paper. The previous literature uses the gradient-based algorithm to obtain optimized non-overlap layout schemes from randomly initialized cases effectively. However, these local optimal solutions are too difficult to jump out of their current relative geometry relationships, significantly limiting their further improvement in performance indicators. Therefore, considering the geometric diversity of layout schemes is put forward to alleviate this limitation. First, similarity measures, including modified cosine similarity and gaussian kernel function similarity, are introduced into the layout optimization process. Then the optimization produces a set of feasible layout candidates with the most remarkable difference in geometric distribution and the most representative schemes are sampled. Finally, these feasible geometric solutions are used as initial solutions to optimize the physical performance indicators of the spacecraft, and diversified layout schemes of spacecraft equipment are generated for the engineering practice. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology are demonstrated by two SELOD applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据