4.1 Article

Power of shared success: how can sharing success and roles of others motivate African women in STEM?

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10775-023-09583-1

关键词

Career paths; Female scientists; Gender inequality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the success and role of African women leaders in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Using a qualitative approach and narratives from African women leaders, the study analyzes the factors contributing to their success in STEM. The findings highlight the importance of balancing career and family life, setting goals, problem-solving, embracing innovation and diversity, collaborating, and having knowledge of STEM research and mentoring skills for successful leadership in STEM.
This study examines the success and role of African women leaders in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In the absence of significant research on women's STEM leadership, the success and roles of others could motivate an aspiring African woman to pursue a career in STEM. A qualitative approach was sought using open online questions and narratives from African women leaders about their roles and career success in STEM. Data were collected from the western, eastern, northern, and southern regions of Africa from participants who held STEM leadership positions, such as directors, deans, and chief officers. The participants were 42 women representing 12 African nations. The narratives of these women leaders' tones and life experiences were analyzed through content analysis. The narratives of these women leaders' tones and life experiences were analyzed in search of recurring patterns and themes. Successful leadership in STEM requires balancing career and family life, setting goals, solving problems, being open to innovative ideas, embracing diversity, collaborating, and having knowledge of STEM research and mentoring skills. Using the achievements and roles of others could inspire future African women to pursue careers in STEM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据