4.6 Article

Sweat Loss Estimation Algorithm for Smartwatches

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 23926-23934

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3253384

关键词

Wearable computers; Sensors; Temperature distribution; Prediction algorithms; Maximum likelihood estimation; Heating systems; Skin; IMU; PPG; fitness; running; sensors; skin temperature; smartwatch; sweat loss estimation; wearables; wrist-wearable device

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel algorithm for smartwatches that estimates sweat loss during running activities. By using a machine learning model, the algorithm accurately predicts the amount of sweat lost in milliliters. A clinical dataset of 748 running tests involving 568 individuals was collected and utilized for training and validation.
This study presents a newly released algorithm for smartwatches - Sweat loss estimation for running activities. A machine learning model (polynomial Kernel Ridge Regression) is used to estimate the sweat loss in milliliters. A clinical dataset of 748 running tests of 568 people was collected and used for training / validation. The data presents a diversity of factors playing an important role in sweat loss: anthropometric parameters of users, distance, ambient temperature and humidity. The data augmentation technique was implemented. One of the key points of the algorithm is an accelerometer-based model for running distance estimation. The model we developed has a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 7.7% and a coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.95 (at distances in the range of 2-20 km). The performance of the fully automatic sweat loss estimation algorithm provides an average root mean square error (RMSE) = 236 ml; more fundamentally, health-related parameter body weight percentage RMSE (RMSEBWP) = 0.33% and R2 = 0.79. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the algorithm provides the best performance of any existing solution or described in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据