4.6 Article

Chaperone-mediated autophagy promotes breast cancer angiogenesis via regulation of aerobic glycolysis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281577

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence shows that chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) plays a role in cancer cell pathogenesis and progression, but its potential role in breast cancer angiogenesis is not known. By manipulating CMA activity in breast cancer cells, researchers found that CMA promotes breast cancer angiogenesis through the regulation of hexokinase 2-dependent aerobic glycolysis. These findings suggest that CMA may serve as a potential target for breast cancer therapies.
Evidence shows that chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is involved in cancer cell pathogenesis and progression. However, the potential role of CMA in breast cancer angiogenesis remains unknown. We first manipulated CMA activity by knockdown and overexpressing of lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A) in MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, T47D and MCF7 cells. We found that the tube formation, migration and proliferation abilities of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were inhibited after cocultured with tumor-conditioned medium from breast cancer cells of LAMP2A knockdown. While the above changes were promoted after cocultured with tumor-conditioned medium from breast cancer cells of LAMP2A overexpression. Moreover, we found that CMA could promote VEGFA expression in breast cancer cells and in xenograft model through upregulating lactate production. Finally, we found that lactate regulation in breast cancer cells is hexokinase 2 (HK2) dependent, and knockdown of HK2 can significantly reduce the ability of CMA-mediated tube formation capacity of HUVECs. Collectively, these results indicate that CMA could promote breast cancer angiogenesis via regulation of HK2-dependent aerobic glycolysis, which may serve as an attractive target for breast cancer therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据