4.7 Article

Budget Online Learning Algorithm for Least Squares SVM

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2574332

关键词

Classification; fixed budget; least squares; SVM (LSSVM); low rank correction; online learning; regression

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013FQ034, ZR2014AP004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [16CX02048A]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11326203, 61503412, 61403419]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Batch-mode least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) is often associated with unbounded number of support vectors (SVs'), making it unsuitable for applications involving large-scale streaming data. Limited-scale LSSVM, which allows efficient updating, seems to be a good solution to tackle this issue. In this paper, to train the limited-scale LSSVM dynamically, we present a budget online LSSVM (BOLSSVM) algorithm. Methodologically, by setting a fixed budget for SVs', we are able to update the LSSVM model according to the updated SVs' set dynamically without retraining from scratch. In particular, when a new small chunk of SVs' substitute for the old ones, the proposed algorithm employs a low rank correction technology and the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula to compute the inverse of saddle point matrix derived from the LSSVM's Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) system, which, in turn, updates the LSSVM model efficiently. In this way, the proposed BOLSSVM algorithm is especially useful for online prediction tasks. Another merit of the proposed BOLSSVM is that it can be used for k-fold cross validation. Specifically, compared with batch-mode learning methods, the computational complexity of the proposed BOLSSVM method is significantly reduced from O(n(4)) to O(n(3)) for leave-one-out cross validation with n training samples. The experimental results of classification and regression on benchmark data sets and real-world applications show the validity and effectiveness of the proposed BOLSSVM algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据