4.7 Article

Multiple Ordinal Regression by Maximizing the Sum of Margins

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2477321

关键词

Computer vision; direct attribute prediction (DAP); object classification; ordinal regression; sequential minimal optimization (SMO); support vector machine (SVM)

资金

  1. Google
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-EY-020834]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human preferences are usually measured using ordinal variables. A system whose goal is to estimate the preferences of humans and their underlying decision mechanisms requires to learn the ordering of any given sample set. We consider the solution of this ordinal regression problem using a support vector machine algorithm. Specifically, the goal is to learn a set of classifiers with common direction vectors and different biases correctly separating the ordered classes. Current algorithms are either required to solve a quadratic optimization problem, which is computationally expensive, or based on maximizing the minimum margin (i.e., a fixed-margin strategy) between a set of hyperplanes, which biases the solution to the closest margin. Another drawback of these strategies is that they are limited to order the classes using a single ranking variable (e.g., perceived length). In this paper, we define a multiple ordinal regression algorithm based on maximizing the sum of the margins between every consecutive class with respect to one or more rankings (e.g., perceived length and weight). We provide derivations of an efficient, easy-to-implement iterative solution using a sequential minimal optimization procedure. We demonstrate the accuracy of our solutions in several data sets. In addition, we provide a key application of our algorithms in estimating human subjects' ordinal classification of attribute associations to object categories. We show that these ordinal associations perform better than the binary one typically employed in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据