4.7 Article

Sodium tantalates: monitoring crystallization via in situ total X-ray scattering

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 25, 期 15, 页码 2256-2263

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ce00121k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the crystallization behavior of amorphous sodium tantalate and reveals that a composite of natrotantite and distorted perovskite, along with a considerable amount of amorphous solid, is obtained during heating the amorphous starting material. The findings are expected to shed light on the changes in band gap energy and photocatalytic performance of this semiconductor material.
Sodium tantalates, which have potential applications in photocatalysis, microelectronics and energy harvesting, are known to crystallize into several polymorphs on which the electrical and optical properties are dependent. As a photocatalyst, amorphous sodium tantalum oxide prepared by a sol-gel method has previously been shown to provide superior activity compared to crystalline counterparts. Intending to understand the structural basis of their activity in catalysis, this work provides insights into the crystallization behavior of sodium tantalates. The structural evolution of amorphous sodium tantalate was monitored during heat-induced crystallization. The local structure was investigated by pair distribution function analysis based on in situ total X-ray scattering experiments. Further information on the spatial arrangements was obtained from complementary scanning transmission electron microscopy and spectroscopy studies. It was found that a composite of natrotantite (R3cH) and distorted perovskite (Cmcm or Pbnm) together with a considerable amount of amorphous solid is obtained during heating the amorphous starting material up to 700 degrees C. The findings of the present work are expected to shine further light on the alterations of the band gap energy and subsequent changes in the photocatalytic performance of this large band gap semiconductor material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据