4.7 Article

Acute toxic effects of microcystin-LR on crayfish (Procambarus clarkii): Insights from antioxidant system, histopathology and intestinal flora

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26171-6

关键词

Microcystin-LR; Procambarus clarkii; Antioxidant system; Histopathology; Intestinal flora

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the toxic effects of MC-LR on crayfish. The results show that MC-LR can effectively accumulate in the hepatopancreas, gills, and intestines of crayfish. Antioxidant-related genes show different expressions in response to MC-LR-induced oxidative stress. MC-LR also leads to histological changes and disruptions in the intestinal flora of crayfish. These findings provide new insights into the toxic impacts of microcystins on aquatic crustaceans.
To study the toxic effects of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) on crayfish, adult male Procambarus clarkii were exposed to different concentrations of MC-LR for 96 h. In the meantime, the accumulation characteristics of MC-LR and the alternations of antioxidant system, histopathology and intestinal flora of P. clarkii were investigated. The results demonstrated that the hepatopancreas, gills and intestines of P. clarkii could effectively accumulate MC-LR. Antioxidant-related genes such as Mn-sod, cat, gst, gpx, mt and hsp70 showed different expression trends in different organs to respond to MC-LR-induced oxidative stress. MC-LR led to histological changes in the hepatopancreas, gills and intestines, thus affecting their corresponding physiological functions. Additionally, the abundances of bacterial phyla including Firmicutes and Planctomycetes and genera including Dysgonomonas, Brevundimonas and Anaerorhabdus in the intestine were significantly changed after MC-LR exposure, and the disruption of intestinal flora might further cause abnormal intestinal microbial metabolism and genetics in P. clarkii. This study provides novel mechanistic insights into the toxic impacts of microcystins on aquatic crustaceans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据