4.6 Article

Influenza Vaccination Behaviour of Healthcare Workers in Switzerland: A Cross-Sectional Study

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605175

关键词

prevention; healthcare workers; vaccination status; vaccination attitude; influenza vaccinations; vaccination behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study conducted in Switzerland found that approximately 40.2% of healthcare workers in the ambulatory setting were vaccinated against influenza. The study also revealed that 78.1% of physicians were vaccinated, compared to only 29.1% of nurses. These findings indicate that demographic factors play a role in healthcare workers' participation in influenza vaccination and their likelihood of recommending it to others.
Objectives: As no data are available regarding the influenza vaccination status of Swiss healthcare workers (HCW) in the ambulatory setting, this study aims to investigate their influenza vaccination behaviours.Methods: We conducted an online survey using a four-item, semi-structured questionnaire to assess HCWs influenza vaccination coverage and behaviour. Associations between influenza vaccination status, age and language as well as recommendation behaviour and reasons for vaccination were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses.Results: Of the 1057 completed questionnaires, 425 (40.2%) HCW were vaccinated and 632 (59.8%) not. 78.1% of the physicians and 47.3% pharmacists were vaccinated, compared to only 29.1% of the nurses, 24.3% pharmacy technicians and 13.0% medical practice assistants (MPA). There was a significant association between influenza vaccination status and HCW profession, age, language and how often an influenza vaccination recommendation was made.Conclusion: Demographic factors seem to influence HCWs' attitudes towards influenza vaccination, which in turn affects the prospect of them recommending the influenza vaccination. Diverse strategies might be necessary to encourage HCW to get vaccinated and hence, promote influenza vaccination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据