4.7 Article

The role of enhancing capsule and modified capsule appearances in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 5801-5811

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09487-2

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Contrast media; Capsules; Diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the value of using EC or modified capsule appearance in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC <= 3.0 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI, and explored the relationship between imaging features and the histological fibrous capsule. The results showed that EC appearance improved the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC, and considering NEC as an alternative capsule appearance allowed for better inter-reader reliability and comparable diagnostic ability.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the value of using enhancing capsule (EC) or modified capsule appearance as a major feature in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC <= 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), and to explore the relationship between the imaging features and the histological fibrous capsule.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 342 hepatic lesions <= 3.0 cm in 319 patients that underwent Gd-EOB-MRIs from January 2018 to March 2021. During dynamic phases and hepatobiliary phase, the modified capsule appearance added the nonenhancing capsule (NEC) (modified LI-RADS + NEC) or corona enhancement (CoE) (modified LI-RADS + CoE) to EC as an alternative capsule appearance. Inter-reader agreement of imaging features was assessed. The diagnostic performances of LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored, and two modified LI-RADS were compared, followed by Bonferroni correction. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the independent features associated with the histological fibrous capsule.ResultsThe inter-reader agreement on EC (0.64) was lower than that on the NEC alternative (0.71) but better than that on CoE alternative (0.58). For HCC diagnosis, compared to LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored showed significantly lower sensitivity (72.7% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.001) with comparable specificity (89.3% vs. 90.7%, p = 1.000). Two modified LI-RADS showed slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity than LI-RADS, without statistical significance (all p >= 0.006). The AUC was highest with modified LI-RADS + NEC (0.82). Both EC and NEC were significantly associated with the fibrous capsule (p < 0.05).ConclusionEC appearance improved the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC <= 3.0 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Considering NEC as an alternative capsule appearance allowed for better inter-reader reliability and comparable diagnostic ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据