4.5 Article

Harnessing benefit from targeting tumor associated carbohydrate antigens

期刊

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 323-331

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1264789

关键词

breast cancer; carbohydrate mimetic peptide; pathological complete response; tumor glycans; TACA; tumor vaccine

资金

  1. Clinical Translational Award from the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Program [W81XWH-06-1-0542]
  2. UAMS Translational Research Institute (TRI)
  3. NIH National Center for Research Resources [UL1TR000039]
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  5. UAMS Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Responses [P20 GM103625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrating additive or synergistic antitumor effects that focus on distinct elements of tumor biology are the most rational strategies for cancer treatment. Treatments for breast cancer have increased overall survival, but remain limited by lack of efficacy in a subset of breast cancer patients. The real challenge is to define what elements of tumor biology make the most sense to be integrated. An emerging strategy is to consider a systems biology approach to impact multiple interactions in networks as compare with hitting a specific protein-protein interaction target. In this review, we consider how targeting tumor associated carbohydrate antigens (TACA) that are fundamental to signal pathways might be tailored to harness benefit from combination therapy of sustained immunity with chemotherapy. An approach we are developing makes use of a carbohydrate mimetic peptide (CMP) to induce polyspecific antibodies, which by their nature have numerous on and off target effects. Linking multi-target TACA recognition with mechanisms affecting tumor growth in the context of network heterogeneity and concepts of immune surveillance to tumor cells and the type of breast cancer patients that would benefit from such an approach provides a novel integrative treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据