3.8 Article

Knowledge, Attitudes and Performance of Iranian Endodontists to Patients with Kidney Diseases

期刊

EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 90-95

出版社

KARE PUBL
DOI: 10.14744/eej.2022.27247

关键词

Chronic kidney disease; clinical performance; dialysis; endodontics; renal failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and performance of Iranian endodontists regarding patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The majority of endodontists had a good understanding of the safe care requirements for dental patients with CKD, but older clinicians may benefit from further education in this area due to limited exposure to formal training.
Objective:The high prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the community, especially in older patients, makes their management an important aspect of clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge attitudes and performance of Iranian endodontists regarding patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study involved 100 Iranian endodontists (41 M, 59 F), who completed questionnaires with 21 items on CKD. Responses were analyzed by SPSS, using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.Results: Overall levels of knowledge were rated as optimal in 55% of subjects, while attitudes to care were favourable in 83%. This cohort of specialist clinicians had strong scores for optimal attitude and performance. Awareness of issues around prescribed analgesics, antibiotic cover, bleeding risk and hypertension was high. Proximity to specialist training (younger specialists, and less years in practice) and female gender were associ-ated with significantly higher scores across the three domains measured.Conclusion: Most specialists were aware of requirements for safe care of dental patients with CKD. Continuing professional education should target older clinicians who may have had less exposure to formal training in this topic during their clinical training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据