4.3 Article

Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy

期刊

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w

关键词

Ionizing radiation; Radiation effects; Pregnancy; Embryo; Fetus; Teratogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess the effects of ionizing radiation on the conceptus during pregnancy and explore strategies to mitigate potential harms. By combining data from peer-reviewed literature and modeling, the study estimates the total doses received from specific radiological procedures. It is found that procedures excluding the conceptus have low doses below the tissue reaction threshold, while procedures including the conceptus may approach or exceed thresholds, requiring careful risk-benefit evaluation. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI and ultralow dose studies are important for dose reduction strategies.
PurposeTo review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy.MethodsData reported in the peer-reviewed literature on entrance KERMA received from specific radiological examinations were combined with published results from experiment or Monte Carlo modeling of tissue and organ doses per entrance KERMA to estimate total doses that could be received from specific procedures. Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on dose mitigation strategies, best practices for shielding, consent, counseling and emerging technologies were reviewed.ResultsFor procedures utilizing ionizing radiation for which the conceptus is not included in the primary radiation beam, typical doses are well below the threshold for causing tissue reactions and the risk of induction of childhood cancer is low. For procedures that include the conceptus in the primary radiation field, longer fluoroscopic interventional procedures or multiphase/multiple exposures potentially could approach or exceed thresholds for tissue reactions and the risk of cancer induction must be weighed against the expected risk/benefit of performing (or not) the imaging examination. Gonadal shielding is no longer considered best practice. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI, dual-energy CT and ultralow dose studies are gaining importance for overall dose reduction strategies.ConclusionThe ALARA principle, considering potential benefits and risks should be followed with respect to the use of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, as Wieseler et al. (2010) state, no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration. Best practices require updates on current available technologies and guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据