4.7 Article

Selectively reductive amination of levulinic acid with aryl amines to N-substituted aryl pyrroles

期刊

GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 438-443

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2021.04.010

关键词

Biomass; Levulinic acid; Reductive amination; Pyrrole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, N-substituted aryl pyrroles were synthesized by reductive amination/cyclization of levulinic acid with primary aromatic amines and hydrosilanes over CsF. The reaction proceeded in two steps, resulting in the formation of intermediate 5-methyl-N-alkyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-pyrrolones and their isomeride (B), followed by chemo- and region-selective reduction to produce the final products. This synthesis approach offers promising applications due to its mild and environmentally friendly conditions.
Synthesizing nitrogen (N)-containing molecules from biomass derivatives is a new strategy for production of this kind of chemicals. Herein, for the first time we present the synthesis of N-substituted aryl pyrroles via reductive amination/cyclization of levulinic acid (LA) with primary aromatic amines and hydrosilanes (e.g., PMHS) over CsF, and a series of N-substituted aryl pyrroles could be obtained in good to excellent yields at 120 degrees C. The mechanism investigation indicates that the reaction proceeds in two steps: the cyclization between amine and LA occurs first to form intermediate 5-methyl-N-alkyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-pyrrolones and their isomeride (B), and then the chemo-and region-selective reduction of intermediates take place to produce the final products. This approach for synthesis of N-substituted aryl pyrroles can be performed under mild and green conditions, which may have promising applications.(c) 2023 Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communi-cations Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据