4.5 Article

Strength of the 'island rule' in birds is positively associated with absence of avian predators

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0536

关键词

ecological release; body mass; insularity; raptors; competitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Island environments have similar characteristics that lead to common patterns of adaptations in island species, known as the 'insularity syndrome'. The island rule is an example of this syndrome, where large species become smaller and small species become larger on islands. Our study shows that predation has a strong effect on body mass evolution of island species, while competition does not have an effect on this pattern.
The similar characteristics shared by island environments have been shown to lead to common patterns of adaptations in island species, commonly referred to as the 'insularity syndrome'. A well-known example is the 'island rule', where large species become smaller on islands and small species become larger, leading to well-known cases of dwarfism and gigantism. This pattern was recently verified on a global scale, but the mechanisms underlying it have been poorly investigated. Here, we focused on the role of released pressure from predation and competition experienced by island birds. Using 120 pairs of endemic island species and their mainland sister relatives, we first verified that the island rule was detected in our dataset, and then evaluated the effects of the numbers of raptors and interspecific competitors on the evolution of the insular species' body mass. We found a strong effect of predation on body mass evolution, with a stronger island rule for species occurring on islands with no raptors, while the pattern disappears in their presence. However, we did not find an effect of competition on this pattern. Our study shows the importance of considering ecological interactions for understanding patterns of body size evolution, and the exceptions to those patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据