4.4 Article

Effect of Fe open metal site in metal-organic frameworks on post-combustion CO2 capture performance

期刊

GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 383-394

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1662

关键词

metal-organic frameworks; CO2 capture; post-combustion; fixed-bed sorption system

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Silpakorn University [TRG5780261]
  3. Silpakorn University Research and Development Institute [SURDI 58/01/48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron open metal site in metal-organic frameworks, MIL-88A and MIL-127(Fe), was tested to investigate its performance on CO2 separation from a binary mixture CO2/N-2 under simulated post-combustion system. The sorption experiment tests were conducted via a fixed-bed reactor with different temperatures ranging between 30 degrees C and 60 degrees C at atmospheric pressure. Maximum CO2 sorption capacity was observed at low temperature of 30 degrees C, where 5.24 mmol could be adsorbed by one gram of MIL-127(Fe) and 4.95 mmol CO2 could be adsorbed by one gram of MIL-88A. The presence of moisture in the gas mixture affected CO2 sorption capacity by reducing CO2 capacity as high as 0.5 mmol CO2 per one gram sorbent. In this work, a dynamic breakthrough model was applied to investigate adsorption behavior of the metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and of the system. The predicted model showed good agreement with experimental results; the Langmuir isotherm model fitted well with our sorption system, suggesting one molecule of CO2 is held at localized sites of the MOFs, which plausibly be at unsaturated Fe2+ metal ion site. Rate of sorption was found to increase with increasing sorption temperature for either intra-particle diffusivity or external mass transfer. Our study suggests that the MOFs containing Fe open metal sites offer an outstanding prospective for CO2 sorption and both MIL-88A and MIL-127(Fe) are good representatives applied for post-combustion CO2 capture. (C) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据