4.6 Article

Reusable nickel foam supported 3D hierarchical Co-Fe-Ni mixed metal oxides with peroxidase-like activity as biosensors for the colorimetric detection of H2O2

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 7575-7582

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nj00127j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel reusable peroxidase mimic, Co/Fe/NiOx@NF, was prepared by self-assembly of 3D hierarchical Co-Fe-Ni mixed oxides on nickel foam. The Co/Fe/NiOx@NF exhibited peroxidase-like activity and a simple and convenient colorimetric sensing platform for H2O2 detection was constructed. The platform showed good linearity and low detection limit, and satisfactory results were obtained in the detection of H2O2 in actual samples.
Nanomaterials with peroxidase-like activity have shown potential for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) detection. However, the difficult separation and poor reusability of nanoparticles have hindered their further applications. Herein, we report a novel reusable peroxidase mimic, Co/Fe/NiOx@NF, prepared by in situ self-assembly of 3D hierarchical Co-Fe-Ni mixed oxides on nickel foam. The Co/Fe/NiOx@NF exhibited peroxidase-like activity, and we constructed a simple and convenient colorimetric sensing platform for H2O2 detection. The sensing platform displayed good linearity with a H2O2 concentration ranging from 0.2 to 4 mM and a low detection limit of 32.9 mu M. We also applied the platform for the detection of H2O2 in actual samples and obtained satisfactory results. Due to the ferromagnetic properties and macro three-dimensional size of nickel foam, Co/Fe/NiOx@NF can be easily recycled using a magnet or tweezers, eliminating the need for high-speed centrifugation as in typical nanozyme systems. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of Co/Fe/NiOx@NF remained stable after one hundred successive cycles, demonstrating its potential for reuse. This feature reduces waste and cost and makes it an environmentally friendly and efficient method for H2O2 detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据