4.6 Article

Rapid generation and number-resolved detection of spinor rubidium Bose-Einstein condensates

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.033303

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a high-flux source of 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates combined with a number-resolving detection is presented for state tomography and interferometric application of entangled quantum states. A hybrid evaporation approach in a magnetic and optical trap is used to create Bose-Einstein condensates of 2 x 105 atoms with minimal thermal fraction within 3.3 s. The low-noise selection and subsequent detection of subsamples of up to 16 atoms are demonstrated, with counting noise below 0.2 atoms. These techniques offer an exciting path towards creating and analyzing mesoscopic quantum states with improved fidelities and their applications in fundamental and metrological fields.
High data acquisition rates and low-noise detection of ultracold neutral atoms present important challenges for the state tomography and interferometric application of entangled quantum states in Bose-Einstein condensates. In this paper, we present a high-flux source of 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates combined with a number -resolving detection. We create Bose-Einstein condensates of 2 x 105 atoms with no discernible thermal fraction within 3.3 s using a hybrid evaporation approach in a magnetic and optical trap. For the high-fidelity tomography of many-body quantum states in the spin degree of freedom [M. Hetzel, et al., arXiv:2207.01270], it is desirable to select a single mode for a number-resolving detection. We demonstrate the low-noise selection of subsamples of up to 16 atoms and their subsequent detection with a counting noise below 0.2 atoms. The presented techniques offer an exciting path towards the creation and analysis of mesoscopic quantum states with improved fidelities and towards their exploitation for fundamental and metrological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据