4.5 Article

Analysis of the failure mechanism and support technology for the Dongtan deep coal roadway

期刊

GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 401-420

出版社

TECHNO-PRESS
DOI: 10.12989/gae.2016.11.3.401

关键词

numerical modeling; deep coal roadway with large section and thick top coal; failure mechanism; crack propagation; combined support system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of of Jiangsu Province for Distinguished Young Scholars [BK20150005]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41272344]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (China University of Mining and Technology) [2014YC10]
  4. Innovation Project of Jiangsu Province [KYLX16_0538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stability of deep coal roadways with large sections and thick top coal is a typical challenge in many coal mines in China. The innovative Universal Discrete Element Code (UDEC) trigon block is adopted to create a numerical model based on a case study at the Dongtan coal mine in China to better understand the failure mechanism and stability control mechanism of this kind of roadway. The failure process of an unsupported roadway is simulated, and the results suggest that the deformation of the roof is more serious than that of the sides and floor, especially in the center of the roof. The radial stress that is released is more intense than the tangential stress, while a large zone of relaxation appears around the roadway. The failure process begins from partial failure at roadway corners, and then propagates deeper into the roof and sides, finally resulting in large deformation in the roadway. A combined support system is proposed to support roadways based on an analysis of the simulation results. The numerical simulation and field monitoring suggest that the availability of this support method is feasible both in theory and practice, which can provide helpful references for research on the failure mechanisms and scientific support designing of engineering in deep coal mines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据