4.6 Article

Terahertz dynamics in the glycerol-water system

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104203

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The model glass former glycerol and its aqueous mixtures were investigated with terahertz-time-domain spectroscopy. The results showed that the infrared absorption coefficient measured with THz-TDS can be related to the reduced Raman intensity and the reduced density of states. The study also found that the dynamics, boson peak, and vibrational dynamics were affected by the presence of clustered and unclustered water.
The model glass former glycerol and its aqueous mixtures were investigated with terahertz-time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) in the frequency range 0.3-3.0 THz at temperatures from 80 to 305 K. It was shown that the infrared absorption coefficient measured with THz-TDS can be theoretically related to the reduced Raman intensity (proportional to alpha/omega 2) and the reduced density of states (proportional to alpha/omega 3) and the agreement with experimental results confirms this. The data were further used to investigate the behavior of model glasses in the harmonic (below the glass transition temperature Tg), anharmonic (above Tg), and liquid regimes. The onset temperature of molecular relaxation as measured by the infrared active dipoles, Tg, was found to correlate with the onset of anharmonic effects, leading to an apparent shift of the boson peak and obscuring it at elevated temperatures. The influence of clustered and unclustered water on the dynamics, the boson peak, and the vibrational dynamics was also investigated. A change in structural dynamics was observed at a water concentration of approximately 5 wt %, corresponding to a transition from isolated water molecules distributed homogeneously throughout the sample to the presence of small water clusters and an increased number of water-water hydrogen bonds which lower the barriers on the potential energy surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据