4.7 Review

Global evolutional trend of safety in coal mining industry: a bibliometric analysis

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26714-x

关键词

Mining safety; Bibliometric analysis; Safety management; Sustainable mining; Dust pollution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bibliometric analysis was conducted to understand the current state and development trend of mine safety research. The findings indicate that coal dust pollution has a significant impact on the environment and research projects prioritize technology innovation over safety norms. Developed countries dominate the literature, leaving a gap in knowledge in developing nations. Future research should focus on creating safer policies, effective safety mines, and solutions to dust pollution and human errors.
Mining safety is recognized as one of the factors influencing the mining industry's long-term viability. Therefore, we did a bibliometric analysis to take stock of safety management in the coal mining industry. This study suggests a three-step strategy, comprising literature extraction and screening, bibliometric analysis, and discussion, to provide an in-depth understanding of the present state and development trend of mine safety research. The findings raise additional concerns which include the following: (i) Coal dust pollution has a direct and indirect impact on the environment. (ii) Most research projects have prioritized technology innovation and development over safety norms. (iii) Most works have come from advanced countries such as China, the USA, the UK, and Australia to the neglect of developing nations, leaving a significant vacuum in the literature. (iv) There are more major safety principles in the food business than in the mining industry, indicating a weak safety culture in the mining industry. Additionally, future research goals are provided, such as creating safer policy guidelines to support technological advancements, constructing effective safety mines, and creating solutions to dust pollution and human errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据