4.6 Article

Asymmetry effects on the phases of RKKY-coupled two-impurity Kondo systems

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.125146

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous study, we demonstrated the presence of either two phase transitions or none in the two-impurity Anderson model with spin exchange coupling between two hosts. These phases include the conventional Kondo and RKKY regimes, as well as a different phase interpreted as a Kondo-stabilized metallic quantum spin liquid. We investigated the impact of various types of asymmetry on this picture and found that the transitions are robust against coupling and particle-hole asymmetries, as long as charge transfer is forbidden. Additionally, we showed that the presence of charge transfer in an extended model changes the phase transitions into crossovers.
In a related work [Phys. Rev. B 107, L121111 (2023)], we have shown that, in the two-impurity Anderson model with two hosts coupled by spin exchange in the most symmetric case, there are either two phase transitions or none. The phases comprise the conventional Kondo and RKKY regimes and a different one, interpreted as a Kondo-stabilized, metallic quantum spin liquid. Here, we analyze how various types of asymmetry affect this picture. We demonstrate that the transitions are robust against the coupling and particle-hole asymmetries, provided charge transfer is forbidden. This holds true despite the scattering phase shift at each impurity taking nonuniversal values. Finally, for an extended model including charge transfer between the hosts and a small Coulomb interaction at the host sites directly coupled to impurities, we show that the presence of charge transfer changes the phase transitions into crossovers. Provided the interhost hopping is sufficiently small, this leads to qualitatively the same physics at nonzero temperature. The relevance of this model for rare-earth atoms in a metallic host is discussed, and potential experimental setups for observing our findings are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据